Translate

Sunday, October 8, 2017

Before Everyone Changes The Subject and We Move On To The Next Mass Shooting In The USA: "A Sick Country Filled With Guns" .....

Will return to the violence in Baja California which nothing - not earthquakes, hurricanes, wars, famine, corruption, mass killings in the USA will stop and something to think about before we move on to the next mass terror killing in the USA:


From the Intercept - link within title which will also take you to the podcast, "Guns Before Country":


A Sick Country Filled With Guns




We live in a sick country. A country where it’s legal for someone to purchase 30 assault weapons and unlimited ammunition, weapons that really only have one purpose: to hunt and kill other human beings. A country where a cabal of high-powered lobbyists, bought-off politicians, and gun manufacturers profits off of massacres, where the meaning of the Second Amendment has been twisted so intensely that it no longer matters why it was written or what it was actually intended for.


The leaders of the National Rifle Association, who would be viewed as terrorist enablers and promoters in a sane society, they don’t like the first part of the Second Amendment — so much so that they don’t include it in their very public memorializing of their Holy Bible of gun addition.


The version of the Second Amendment displayed at the NRA’s headquarters doesn’t include the first half of the Second Amendment. The NRA only wants you to focus on the second half, which says, “… the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The first part of the Second Amendment, which the NRA finds too inconvenient to include, states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State …”


Was the Las Vegas shooter a member of a well-regulated militia? No. Were any of the murderers who shot up schools or religious assemblies or workplaces members of a well-regulated militia? No. And regulated — that’s an interesting word, because no thoughtful person can really argue that guns in the United States are actually regulated in any meaningful way. In this country, you can buy dozens of assault weapons. You can store enough guns and ammunition in your garage to wage a small war. Why? Because the Second Amendment has been laundered through lobbyists, and some Supreme Court justices, to mean something it does not mean.


The coalition that fans the flames of fear and promotes the idea that guns keep us safe — that the solution to gun violence is more guns — makes a shitload of money off of all this death and misery. And they will make more money off of the Las Vegas massacre.


You can murder 20 innocent children between the ages of 6 and 7 at Sandy Hook Elementary School and these villains are unmoved in their belief in the golden calf of assault rifles. “If only the teachers had been armed, those kids might be alive today. Now let’s check out our stock prices.”


Each time we’re faced with a new mass murder with guns, in this case 58 killed and more than 500 wounded, we end up in the same place: “Let’s pray. Let’s tweak this or that law. Let’s talk about using acoustic sensors to detect gunshots. Let’s put armed private security in schools. Let’s use the terrorist watchlist to deny gun purchases. Let’s have more surveillance, more religious and racial profiling.” Which is absurd, given that most mass shooters are white.


None of what most politicians and TV pundits offer up in the aftermath of these killings is going to do anything to solve the real issue: We are a nation filled to the brim with guns, including assault weapons that are actually meant for assaulting people. Not for hunting. Not for sport, unless your sport is murder.


Watch what happens in Congress in the coming days. Empty platitudes. Bullshit proposals: “We must do something about this.” And, of course, a lot of prayer. But none of that is going to change to the fact that we live in a sick society that believes guns bring us security. A nation that has been taught by powerful, twisted people that guns aren’t part of the problem. That everything except guns — and how easy they are to get — is the problem. Mental illness is the problem. Muslims are the problem. Gangbangers in Chicago are the problem. Not having a gun is the problem. And when these mass shootings happen, most of the time, the shooter is a white man. We want to know who he was, why did it, what his motive was, as we should. But compare that to how black victims of police killings are treated in the media: “Well, did they do drugs? What were they wearing? Did they have a criminal record? Did they listen to hip hop? Where are the fathers?”


After he was killed by George Zimmerman, Trayvon Martin was characterized as a thug, his hooded sweatshirt somehow evidence that he was scary or menacing. That’s how black victims are portrayed. After police shot Tamir Rice, the head of Miami’s police union called the 12-year-old a thug, saying that if you act like a thug, you’ll get treated like one.


Contrast that with some of the stories we’ve seen about the Las Vegas shooter — not victim — shooter! One headline (since changed) in the Washington Post said he “enjoyed gambling, country music, lived quiet life before massacre.” Black victim is a thug; white shooter is a character from a country western song who just happens to murder 58 people. It’s sick. And this is a pattern.


What if mass shootings carried out by white men were covered the same way that stories involving shooters of other races are covered on a daily basis in this country? White-on-white crime. Let’s investigate country music and its violent lyrics. Let’s find some white people brave enough to speak out on this pandemic of white men carrying out mass shootings at an alarming rate. And let’s make them speak for their entire race.


We all know why the narratives are different. And another thing: We’re hearing once again that this is the most deadly mass shooting in U.S. history. It’s just not true. There are several examples of white gunmen killing huge numbers of black people. The 1917 East St. Louis massacre resulted in an estimated 100 black people being shot and lynched; in 1873, between 60 and 150 black people were massacred in Colfax, Louisiana. We don’t even know the exact numbers of Native Americans killed in mass shootings since the founding of the United States: Hundreds were killed in places like Sand Creek, Clear Lake, and Wounded Knee.


Donald Trump, who boasts that he’ll be the best friend the NRA could possibly have in the White House, suddenly found God when he first addressed the Las Vegas shooting. Let’s be real: Trump’s deepest connection to the Bible is watching Charlton Heston as Moses. But religious Trump, who speaks from the Scriptures, was praised for his perfect tone across the media. Specifically, on CNN: “Just what we needed to hear.”


A big part of our problem on guns is how it’s discussed in the media. Presidents who get prayerful are praised instead of held accountable for the role they play in sustaining this nation’s gun addiction, in promoting the gun industry that profits off of murder. When the shooter is an Arab or a Muslim, they are often immediately branded as a suspected terrorist. After Las Vegas, the president and other politicians called this shooter “deranged” or “insane” or another word that’s lost all meaning — “evil.”


When it’s a Muslim shooter, it’s perfectly acceptable to talk about what the U.S. response should be: watchlisting, banning people from entering the country, surveillance of mosques. But when white people do the killing, don’t talk about guns. That’s politicizing the tragedy, disrespecting the victims. Whether it’s someone inspired by ISIS murdering his coworkers or a white man shooting up a school or a white man gunning down Sikhs because he thought they were Muslims, they all do it with guns.


We don’t need prayers. We don’t need fake unity over the tragedy. We need to look at the common factor in all of these heinous acts of mass murder: guns. Anything else is just putting a Band-Aid on a gaping, infected, and lethal wound on our society.

Adapted from Jeremy Scahill’s commentary on Intercepted.


**********

Tuesday, October 3, 2017

Las Vegas Massacre: I Would Be Completely Surprised If There Are Any Changes Made To USA Gun Laws......

.....particularly since Trump supports the NRA who basically controls both houses....errr, the government.  Good reports from Common Dreams (more and more on their sidebar):


Hat Tip to Frontera's Cartoon This Morning - BTW, I do have updates on 09/17's homicidios dolosos totals, will edit last blog. Shooters most likely got their weapons from the USA.




 "It's time for Congress to get off its ass and do something."
 

Message to US Lawmakers: 'Quit Praying and Start Drafting Gun Control Legislation'
By, Jon Queally





White House:  Deadliest Shooting in US History No Reason to Have "Political Debate" About Guns
By, Jon Queally


**********

Just disgusted.


Las Vegas Massacre: I Would Be Completely Surprised If There Are Any Changes Made To USA Gun Laws......

.....particularly since Trump supports the NRA who basically controls both houses....errr, the government.  Good reports from Common Dreams (more and more on their sidebar):


Hat Tip to Frontera's Cartoon This Morning - BTW, I do have updates on 09/17's homicidios dolosos totals, will edit last blog. Shooters most likely got their weapons from the USA.




 "It's time for Congress to get off its ass and do something."
 

Message to US Lawmakers: 'Quit Praying and Start Drafting Gun Control Legislation'
By, Jon Queally





White House:  Deadliest Shooting in US History No Reason to Have "Political Debate" About Guns
By, Jon Queally


**********

Just disgusted.


Sunday, October 1, 2017

Mayor of San Juan to Trump: "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn." - September Stats for Homicidios Dolosos Are Coming In Slowly: At 7:00am Frontera Reports 201 Executions in Tijuana During the Month of September, 2017

 - Let's do Trump first.  I mentioned to a commenter a few days back that Puerto Rico's conditions looked worse off than Mexico's affected earthquake areas. And it didn't only look as though conditions were worse in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria as far as receiving help, they were and still are worse despite the sugar coated reports we are receiving from the White House.

From this morning's The Guardian: 10/01/17


Puerto Rico: Trump Spat with San Juan Mayor Escalates As All Sides Double Down
By, Amanda Holpuch & Ed Pikington

At the Intercept many reports on Puerto Rico, as well as Democracy Now!

More over on Counterpunch , Common Dreams, Truth Out. Truthdig, Bill Moyers et al.  

From Counterpunch:

Memento Mori: A Requiem For Puerto Rico
by, Miguel A. Cruz-Diaz


Puerto Rico and Trump's rush to arrest hundreds of immigrants in Sanctuary Cities (believed to be in response to pending and proposed lawsuits against his Wall prototypes now under construction in San Diego and a reluctance by some politicos to use the DACA kids as a bargaining chip for him to receive funding for the Wall), his outrageous tax proposal which would only benefit the most wealthy, his call to have NFL players fired for taking the knee again demonstrate his insanity - but this one takes the cake; his response to Rex Tillerson's statements of negotiation with North Korea:


From The Guardian: 10/01/17

Trump Says Rex Tillerson 'Wasting His Time' With North Korea Negotiations 
by, Martin Pengelly & Ed Pikington


The Trump Tweets:



I probably missed a few, you can fill in the blanks.

**********

The September 2017 Executions In Tijuana

 - On 09/30 at 8:00am, Frontera gave us the latest statistics from the PGJE of homicidios dolosos/executions in Tijuana.  At that point, according the the authorities, the number stood at 198 in Tijuana with the YTD figure at 1,263.

Lo Acribillan Cuando Salia a Su Trabajo
por,  Angel F. Gonzalez


 - This morning Frontera reported at 7:00am that September of 2017 closed with 201 executions
in Tijuana YTD just in Tijuana then would be 1,265.

Cerro Septiembre con 201 Asesinatos
por, Luis Gerardo Andrade

Watch for updates on these figures in the coming weeks.

**********

 - So Here's The Fix:


From The Intercept - 09/26/2017: Link within title

Brazil’s Latest Outbreak of Drug Gang Violence Highlights the Real Culprit: the War on Drugs

09/26/2017



"On July 1, 2001, Portugal enacted a law to decriminalize all drugs. Under that law, nobody who is found possessing or using narcotics is arrested in Portugal, nor are they turned into a criminal. Indeed, neither drug use nor possession is considered a crime at all. Instead, those found doing it are sent to speak with a panel of drug counsellors and therapists, where they are offered treatment options.

Seven years after the law was enacted, in 2008, we traveled to Lisbon to study the effects of that law for one of the first comprehensive reports on this policy, the findings of which were published in a report for the Cato Institute. The results were clear and stunning: This radical change in drug laws was a fundamental and undeniable success.

While Portugal throughout the 1990s was (like most Western countries) drowning in drug overdoses along with drug-related violence and diseases, the country rose to the top of the charts in virtually all categories after it stopped prosecuting drug users and treating them like criminals. This stood in stark contrast to countries that continued to follow a harsh criminalization approach: the more they arrested addicts and waged a “war on drugs,” the more their drug problems worsened.

With all the money that had been wasted in Portugal to prosecute and imprison drug users now freed up for treatment programs, and the government viewed with trust rather than fear, previously hopeless addicts transformed into success stories of stability and health, and the government’s anti-drug messages were heeded. The predicted rise in drug usage rates never happened; in some key demographic categories, usage actually declined. As the 2009 study concluded: “The data show that, judged by virtually every metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework has been a resounding success.”
“The data show that, judged by virtually every metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework has been a resounding success.”
Over the weekend, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, writing from Lisbon, re-visited this data, now even more ample and conclusive than it was back in 2009. His conclusions were even more stark than the Cato report of eight years ago: namely, Portugal has definitively won the argument on how ineffective, irrational, and counterproductive drug prohibition is. 

The basis for this conclusion: Portugal’s clear success with decriminalization, compared to the tragic failures of countries, such as the U.S. (and Brazil), which continue to treat addiction as a criminal and moral problem rather than a health problem. Kristof writes:
After more than 15 years, it’s clear which approach worked better. The United States drug policy failed spectacularly, with about as many Americans dying last year of overdoses — around 64,000 — as were killed in the Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq Wars combined.
In contrast, Portugal may be winning the war on drugs — by ending it. Today, the Health Ministry estimates that only about 25,000 Portuguese use heroin, down from 100,000 when the policy began.
The number of Portuguese dying from overdoses plunged more than 85 percent before rising a bit in the aftermath of the European economic crisis of recent years. Even so, Portugal’s drug mortality rate is the lowest in Western Europe — one-tenth the rate of Britain or Denmark — and about one-fiftieth the latest number for the U.S.

Kristof succinctly identified one key reason for this success: “It’s incomparably cheaper to treat people than to jail them.” But there are other vital reasons, including the key fact that when it comes to efforts to persuade addicts to obtain counseling, “decriminalization makes all this easier, because people no longer fear arrest.”

 Perhaps the most compelling evidence highlighting Portugal’s success is not the empirical data but the political reality: Whereas the law was quite controversial when first enacted 16 years ago, there are now no significant political factions agitating for its repeal or for a return to drug prohibition.
This evidence is of vital importance to the citizens of any country that continues to treat drug users and addicts as criminals. It is simply unconscionable to break up families, force children to remain apart from imprisoned parents, and turn drug addicts into unemployable felons, particularly if the data demonstrates that those policies achieve the opposite results as their claimed intent.


But moral questions aside, the drug-related violence now sweeping Brazil, particularly the horrific war that is engulfing the Rio de Janeiro favela of Rocinha — just a few years after it was declared “pacified” — makes these questions of particular urgency for Brazilians and citizens of any country. Brazil has witnessed repeated outbreaks of horrific violence in the favelas of its largest cities, many of which have long been ruled not by the government but by well-armed drug gangs. But this past week’s war — and that’s what it is — in Rocinha, located in the middle of Rio de Janeiro’s fashionable Zona Sul, has been particularly shocking.


 Competing drug gangs have “invaded” the favela
 and are in open warfare for control of the drug trade,
 in the process forcing schools to close,
 residents to cower in their homes,
 and stores to remain shuttered.
As Misha Glenny reported on Monday in The Intercept,
 “The immediate cause of violence is the
 ongoing struggle between and now within factions,”
 but the violence portends the high 
 likelihood of a wider war for control of the drug trade. 


In the face of drug-related violence, there is a temptation to embrace the seemingly simplest solution: an even-greater war on drugs, more drug dealers and addicts in prison, more police, more prohibition.
Those who peddle this approach want people to believe a simple-minded string of reasoning: the cause of drug-related problems, such as violence from drug gangs, is drugs. Therefore, we must eliminate drugs. Therefore, the more problems we have from drugs, the more aggressively we rid society of drugs and those who sell and use them.


But this mentality is based on an obvious, tragic fallacy: namely, that the war on drugs, and drug criminalization, will eliminate drugs or at least reduce its availability. Decades of failure prove this will not happen; rather, the opposite will occur. Like the U.S., Brazil has imprisoned hundreds of thousands of citizens for drug-related crimes — mostly poor and nonwhite — and the problem has only worsened. Any person with minimal rationality would be forced to admit this string of logic is false.


Supporting a failed policy by hoping that, one day, it will magically succeed, is the definition of irrationality. In the case of drug laws — which spawn misery and suffering — it is not only irrational but cruel. 


A 2011 report from the Global Commission on Drug Policy — featuring multiple world leaders including former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan and former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso — examined all relevant evidence and put it simply: “The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world.”
The primary fact in this conclusion is vitally important. The key cause of all drug-related pathologies — particularly gang violence of the type now suffocating Rocinha — is not drugs themselves, but rather the policy of criminalizing drugs and the war waged in its name.



The nature of drugs — their small size, the ease of smuggling, the natural demand humans have for them — means they can never be eliminated or meaningfully reduced by force. Only changes in human behavior, which can happen with sustained and professional treatment, can foster those improvements. The only effect of drug criminalization, beyond the massive human and financial waste of imprisoning addicts, is to empower and enrich drug gangs by ensuring that the profits from selling an illegal product remain irresistibly high.


For that reason, the most devoted opponents of drug legalization or decriminalization are drug gangs themselves. Nothing would erase the power of drug gangs — such as the ones violently battling for control of Rocinha — more quickly or severely than the elimination of drug prohibition. As adept businesspeople, drug traffickers know that very well.

'THE MOST DEVOTED OPPONENTS OF DRUG LEGALIZATION OR DECRIMINALIZATION ARE DRUG GANGS THEMSELVES"

In 2011, the journalist Johann Hari, author of one of the most influential books on drug addiction, wrote an article in The Huffington Post titled: “The Only Thing Drug Gangs and Cartels Fear Is Legalization.” As he put it:
When you criminalize a drug for which there is a large market, it doesn’t disappear. The trade is simply transferred from off-licenses, pharmacists and doctors to armed criminal gangs. In order to protect their patch and their supply routes, these gangs tool up — and kill anyone who gets in their way. You can see this any day on the streets of a poor part of London or Los Angeles, where teenage gangs stab or shoot each other for control of the 3000 percent profit margins on offer.
We have a perfect historical analogy that proves this point: alcohol prohibition in the U.S. in the 1920s. When alcohol was made illegal, it did not disappear. Control of its sale and distribution simply shifted: from the corner grocery story to violent drug gangs of the type that Al Capone became famous for ruling.


In other words, making alcohol illegal did not stop people from consuming it. What it did do, though, was empower vicious gangs of organized crime for whom the massive profits of selling illegal alcohol made them willing to do anything, or kill anyone, to protect it.


What finally eliminated those violent prohibition gangs was not the police or the imprisonment of illegal dealers or alcoholics: During prohibition, when the gangs weren’t bribing the police, they were killing them. What eliminated those gangs was the re-legalization of alcohol: by regulating the sale of alcohol, the end of prohibition made the gangs irrelevant, and they thus disappeared. 


Violent drug gangs do not fear the war on drugs; to the contrary, as Hari notes, they crave it. It is the criminalization of drugs that makes their trade so profitable. Hari quotes a long-time drug enforcement official in the U.S. as relating: “On one undercover tape-recorded conversation, a top cartel chief, Jorge Roman, expressed his gratitude for the drug war, calling it ‘a sham put on the American tax-payer’ that was ‘actually good for business.’”


In 2015, Danielle Allen, a political theorist at Harvard University, wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post titled “How the war on drugs creates violence.” In it, she explained that one key reason to “decriminalize drugs flows from how the war on drugs drives violent crime, which in turn pushes up incarceration and generates other negative social outcomes.” As she explained: “You just can’t move $100 billion worth of illegal product without a lot of assault and homicide. This should not be a hard point to see or make.”


Why is Rocinha filled with guns and ruled by drug gangs that are capable of such violence? Why can an influential Brazilian politician, linked to some of the most powerful figures in the country, employ a pilot who was caught transporting millions of dollars in cocaine in a helicopter owned by the politician, with no consequences for anyone? 


The answer is clear: because laws that outlaw drugs ensure that the drug trade is extremely profitable, which in turn ensures that gangs of organized criminals will arm themselves, and will kill, in order to control it. Situated in the middle of Zona Sul with easy exits, Rocinha will inevitably be a drug haven for rich tourists, middle-class professionals, and impoverished addicts. The vast sums of profits created by the war on drugs ensure that police forces will not only be out-armed but also so corrupted that their efforts will inevitably fail.


It is now undeniably clear that it is the war on drugs itself which is what causes — not stops — drug-related violence.


If you’re horrified by the violence in Rocinha or places around the world like it, the last thing you should do is support more policies that fuel the violence: namely, criminalization and the war on drugs. To do so is like protesting lung cancer by encouraging people to smoke. The data is now sufficient to state confidently: those who support ongoing drug criminalization are the ones abetting this drug violence and the related problems of addiction and overdose.


It may be slightly paradoxical at first glance, but the data leaves no doubt: The only way to avoid Rocinha-style violence is through full drug decriminalization. We no longer need to speculate about this. Thanks to Portugal, the results are in, and they could not be clearer."


David Miranda is the husband of Intercept co-founder Glenn Greenwald and a city councilmember for Rio de Janeiro (PSOL).

**********

Meanwhile an update on Paris:  We heard back from Vet Playas who wanted another consultation re her surgery and indicated that a plate in her leg could be iffy with complications, particularly at this late date and development. We do like Dr. Fimbres, he has been completely honest with us.  So we are going back up to the States to VCA in Kearny Mesa for a consultation with Dr. Jackson hopefully this week. Won't know more until we do that, but the time is pressing.  Next, cleaning out her huge crate I took the knee(s) and pulled my back out of whack.  I'm moving a little better but Mike has had to do all the chores.

P.S. If you can afford it, this Saturday the 7th at the McCullum Theatre in Palm Desert, Bill Murray and Jan Vogler are presenting their "New Worlds" - wish we could go.

**********

Christ, I almost forgot Dotard's UN Speech:





Mayor of San Juan to Trump: "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn." - September Stats for Homicidios Dolosos Are Coming In Slowly: At 7:00am Frontera Reports 201 Executions in Tijuana During the Month of September, 2017

 - Let's do Trump first.  I mentioned to a commenter a few days back that Puerto Rico's conditions looked worse off than Mexico's affected earthquake areas. And it didn't only look as though conditions were worse in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria as far as receiving help, they were and still are worse despite the sugar coated reports we are receiving from the White House.

From this morning's The Guardian: 10/01/17


Puerto Rico: Trump Spat with San Juan Mayor Escalates As All Sides Double Down
By, Amanda Holpuch & Ed Pikington

At the Intercept many reports on Puerto Rico, as well as Democracy Now!

More over on Counterpunch , Common Dreams, Truth Out. Truthdig, Bill Moyers et al.  

From Counterpunch:

Memento Mori: A Requiem For Puerto Rico
by, Miguel A. Cruz-Diaz


Puerto Rico and Trump's rush to arrest hundreds of immigrants in Sanctuary Cities (believed to be in response to pending and proposed lawsuits against his Wall prototypes now under construction in San Diego and a reluctance by some politicos to use the DACA kids as a bargaining chip for him to receive funding for the Wall), his outrageous tax proposal which would only benefit the most wealthy, his call to have NFL players fired for taking the knee again demonstrate his insanity - but this one takes the cake; his response to Rex Tillerson's statements of negotiation with North Korea:


From The Guardian: 10/01/17

Trump Says Rex Tillerson 'Wasting His Time' With North Korea Negotiations 
by, Martin Pengelly & Ed Pikington


The Trump Tweets:



I probably missed a few, you can fill in the blanks.

**********

The September 2017 Executions In Tijuana

 - On 09/30 at 8:00am, Frontera gave us the latest statistics from the PGJE of homicidios dolosos/executions in Tijuana.  At that point, according the the authorities, the number stood at 198 in Tijuana with the YTD figure at 1,263.

Lo Acribillan Cuando Salia a Su Trabajo
por,  Angel F. Gonzalez


 - This morning Frontera reported at 7:00am that September of 2017 closed with 201 executions
in Tijuana YTD just in Tijuana then would be 1,265.

Cerro Septiembre con 201 Asesinatos
por, Luis Gerardo Andrade

Watch for updates on these figures in the coming weeks.

**********

 - So Here's The Fix:


From The Intercept - 09/26/2017: Link within title

Brazil’s Latest Outbreak of Drug Gang Violence Highlights the Real Culprit: the War on Drugs

09/26/2017



"On July 1, 2001, Portugal enacted a law to decriminalize all drugs. Under that law, nobody who is found possessing or using narcotics is arrested in Portugal, nor are they turned into a criminal. Indeed, neither drug use nor possession is considered a crime at all. Instead, those found doing it are sent to speak with a panel of drug counsellors and therapists, where they are offered treatment options.

Seven years after the law was enacted, in 2008, we traveled to Lisbon to study the effects of that law for one of the first comprehensive reports on this policy, the findings of which were published in a report for the Cato Institute. The results were clear and stunning: This radical change in drug laws was a fundamental and undeniable success.

While Portugal throughout the 1990s was (like most Western countries) drowning in drug overdoses along with drug-related violence and diseases, the country rose to the top of the charts in virtually all categories after it stopped prosecuting drug users and treating them like criminals. This stood in stark contrast to countries that continued to follow a harsh criminalization approach: the more they arrested addicts and waged a “war on drugs,” the more their drug problems worsened.

With all the money that had been wasted in Portugal to prosecute and imprison drug users now freed up for treatment programs, and the government viewed with trust rather than fear, previously hopeless addicts transformed into success stories of stability and health, and the government’s anti-drug messages were heeded. The predicted rise in drug usage rates never happened; in some key demographic categories, usage actually declined. As the 2009 study concluded: “The data show that, judged by virtually every metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework has been a resounding success.”
“The data show that, judged by virtually every metric, the Portuguese decriminalization framework has been a resounding success.”
Over the weekend, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, writing from Lisbon, re-visited this data, now even more ample and conclusive than it was back in 2009. His conclusions were even more stark than the Cato report of eight years ago: namely, Portugal has definitively won the argument on how ineffective, irrational, and counterproductive drug prohibition is. 

The basis for this conclusion: Portugal’s clear success with decriminalization, compared to the tragic failures of countries, such as the U.S. (and Brazil), which continue to treat addiction as a criminal and moral problem rather than a health problem. Kristof writes:
After more than 15 years, it’s clear which approach worked better. The United States drug policy failed spectacularly, with about as many Americans dying last year of overdoses — around 64,000 — as were killed in the Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq Wars combined.
In contrast, Portugal may be winning the war on drugs — by ending it. Today, the Health Ministry estimates that only about 25,000 Portuguese use heroin, down from 100,000 when the policy began.
The number of Portuguese dying from overdoses plunged more than 85 percent before rising a bit in the aftermath of the European economic crisis of recent years. Even so, Portugal’s drug mortality rate is the lowest in Western Europe — one-tenth the rate of Britain or Denmark — and about one-fiftieth the latest number for the U.S.

Kristof succinctly identified one key reason for this success: “It’s incomparably cheaper to treat people than to jail them.” But there are other vital reasons, including the key fact that when it comes to efforts to persuade addicts to obtain counseling, “decriminalization makes all this easier, because people no longer fear arrest.”

 Perhaps the most compelling evidence highlighting Portugal’s success is not the empirical data but the political reality: Whereas the law was quite controversial when first enacted 16 years ago, there are now no significant political factions agitating for its repeal or for a return to drug prohibition.
This evidence is of vital importance to the citizens of any country that continues to treat drug users and addicts as criminals. It is simply unconscionable to break up families, force children to remain apart from imprisoned parents, and turn drug addicts into unemployable felons, particularly if the data demonstrates that those policies achieve the opposite results as their claimed intent.


But moral questions aside, the drug-related violence now sweeping Brazil, particularly the horrific war that is engulfing the Rio de Janeiro favela of Rocinha — just a few years after it was declared “pacified” — makes these questions of particular urgency for Brazilians and citizens of any country. Brazil has witnessed repeated outbreaks of horrific violence in the favelas of its largest cities, many of which have long been ruled not by the government but by well-armed drug gangs. But this past week’s war — and that’s what it is — in Rocinha, located in the middle of Rio de Janeiro’s fashionable Zona Sul, has been particularly shocking.


 Competing drug gangs have “invaded” the favela
 and are in open warfare for control of the drug trade,
 in the process forcing schools to close,
 residents to cower in their homes,
 and stores to remain shuttered.
As Misha Glenny reported on Monday in The Intercept,
 “The immediate cause of violence is the
 ongoing struggle between and now within factions,”
 but the violence portends the high 
 likelihood of a wider war for control of the drug trade. 


In the face of drug-related violence, there is a temptation to embrace the seemingly simplest solution: an even-greater war on drugs, more drug dealers and addicts in prison, more police, more prohibition.
Those who peddle this approach want people to believe a simple-minded string of reasoning: the cause of drug-related problems, such as violence from drug gangs, is drugs. Therefore, we must eliminate drugs. Therefore, the more problems we have from drugs, the more aggressively we rid society of drugs and those who sell and use them.


But this mentality is based on an obvious, tragic fallacy: namely, that the war on drugs, and drug criminalization, will eliminate drugs or at least reduce its availability. Decades of failure prove this will not happen; rather, the opposite will occur. Like the U.S., Brazil has imprisoned hundreds of thousands of citizens for drug-related crimes — mostly poor and nonwhite — and the problem has only worsened. Any person with minimal rationality would be forced to admit this string of logic is false.


Supporting a failed policy by hoping that, one day, it will magically succeed, is the definition of irrationality. In the case of drug laws — which spawn misery and suffering — it is not only irrational but cruel. 


A 2011 report from the Global Commission on Drug Policy — featuring multiple world leaders including former United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan and former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso — examined all relevant evidence and put it simply: “The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world.”
The primary fact in this conclusion is vitally important. The key cause of all drug-related pathologies — particularly gang violence of the type now suffocating Rocinha — is not drugs themselves, but rather the policy of criminalizing drugs and the war waged in its name.



The nature of drugs — their small size, the ease of smuggling, the natural demand humans have for them — means they can never be eliminated or meaningfully reduced by force. Only changes in human behavior, which can happen with sustained and professional treatment, can foster those improvements. The only effect of drug criminalization, beyond the massive human and financial waste of imprisoning addicts, is to empower and enrich drug gangs by ensuring that the profits from selling an illegal product remain irresistibly high.


For that reason, the most devoted opponents of drug legalization or decriminalization are drug gangs themselves. Nothing would erase the power of drug gangs — such as the ones violently battling for control of Rocinha — more quickly or severely than the elimination of drug prohibition. As adept businesspeople, drug traffickers know that very well.

'THE MOST DEVOTED OPPONENTS OF DRUG LEGALIZATION OR DECRIMINALIZATION ARE DRUG GANGS THEMSELVES"

In 2011, the journalist Johann Hari, author of one of the most influential books on drug addiction, wrote an article in The Huffington Post titled: “The Only Thing Drug Gangs and Cartels Fear Is Legalization.” As he put it:
When you criminalize a drug for which there is a large market, it doesn’t disappear. The trade is simply transferred from off-licenses, pharmacists and doctors to armed criminal gangs. In order to protect their patch and their supply routes, these gangs tool up — and kill anyone who gets in their way. You can see this any day on the streets of a poor part of London or Los Angeles, where teenage gangs stab or shoot each other for control of the 3000 percent profit margins on offer.
We have a perfect historical analogy that proves this point: alcohol prohibition in the U.S. in the 1920s. When alcohol was made illegal, it did not disappear. Control of its sale and distribution simply shifted: from the corner grocery story to violent drug gangs of the type that Al Capone became famous for ruling.


In other words, making alcohol illegal did not stop people from consuming it. What it did do, though, was empower vicious gangs of organized crime for whom the massive profits of selling illegal alcohol made them willing to do anything, or kill anyone, to protect it.


What finally eliminated those violent prohibition gangs was not the police or the imprisonment of illegal dealers or alcoholics: During prohibition, when the gangs weren’t bribing the police, they were killing them. What eliminated those gangs was the re-legalization of alcohol: by regulating the sale of alcohol, the end of prohibition made the gangs irrelevant, and they thus disappeared. 


Violent drug gangs do not fear the war on drugs; to the contrary, as Hari notes, they crave it. It is the criminalization of drugs that makes their trade so profitable. Hari quotes a long-time drug enforcement official in the U.S. as relating: “On one undercover tape-recorded conversation, a top cartel chief, Jorge Roman, expressed his gratitude for the drug war, calling it ‘a sham put on the American tax-payer’ that was ‘actually good for business.’”


In 2015, Danielle Allen, a political theorist at Harvard University, wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post titled “How the war on drugs creates violence.” In it, she explained that one key reason to “decriminalize drugs flows from how the war on drugs drives violent crime, which in turn pushes up incarceration and generates other negative social outcomes.” As she explained: “You just can’t move $100 billion worth of illegal product without a lot of assault and homicide. This should not be a hard point to see or make.”


Why is Rocinha filled with guns and ruled by drug gangs that are capable of such violence? Why can an influential Brazilian politician, linked to some of the most powerful figures in the country, employ a pilot who was caught transporting millions of dollars in cocaine in a helicopter owned by the politician, with no consequences for anyone? 


The answer is clear: because laws that outlaw drugs ensure that the drug trade is extremely profitable, which in turn ensures that gangs of organized criminals will arm themselves, and will kill, in order to control it. Situated in the middle of Zona Sul with easy exits, Rocinha will inevitably be a drug haven for rich tourists, middle-class professionals, and impoverished addicts. The vast sums of profits created by the war on drugs ensure that police forces will not only be out-armed but also so corrupted that their efforts will inevitably fail.


It is now undeniably clear that it is the war on drugs itself which is what causes — not stops — drug-related violence.


If you’re horrified by the violence in Rocinha or places around the world like it, the last thing you should do is support more policies that fuel the violence: namely, criminalization and the war on drugs. To do so is like protesting lung cancer by encouraging people to smoke. The data is now sufficient to state confidently: those who support ongoing drug criminalization are the ones abetting this drug violence and the related problems of addiction and overdose.


It may be slightly paradoxical at first glance, but the data leaves no doubt: The only way to avoid Rocinha-style violence is through full drug decriminalization. We no longer need to speculate about this. Thanks to Portugal, the results are in, and they could not be clearer."


David Miranda is the husband of Intercept co-founder Glenn Greenwald and a city councilmember for Rio de Janeiro (PSOL).

**********

Meanwhile an update on Paris:  We heard back from Vet Playas who wanted another consultation re her surgery and indicated that a plate in her leg could be iffy with complications, particularly at this late date and development. We do like Dr. Fimbres, he has been completely honest with us.  So we are going back up to the States to VCA in Kearny Mesa for a consultation with Dr. Jackson hopefully this week. Won't know more until we do that, but the time is pressing.  Next, cleaning out her huge crate I took the knee(s) and pulled my back out of whack.  I'm moving a little better but Mike has had to do all the chores.

P.S. If you can afford it, this Saturday the 7th at the McCullum Theatre in Palm Desert, Bill Murray and Jan Vogler are presenting their "New Worlds" - wish we could go.

**********

Christ, I almost forgot Dotard's UN Speech:





Wednesday, September 20, 2017

The 7.1 Mexico Earthquake - Update: USAID - Update: Don't Forget To Use Otay This Weekend If You Are Crossing Into Mexico UPDATE: Have added Frontera & Zeta's Full and Ongoing Coverage - Don't Miss The Ones About Graco Ramirez and Theft/Hoarding of Supplies Meant For Earthquake Victims From Zeta --Update 9/24 : GSA Opening Up San Ysidro 12 Hours Earlier

Rescue teams from Tijuana and Ensenada are already on their way down to Mexico City to help in any way they can.  Meanwhile, there are established centers to drop off goods needed so badly locally:

Frontera

Decenas de Centros de Acopio se Instalan en Tijuana


For the latest up to date English reports & videos of the earthquake, we have been watching this:

The Guardian

Mexico Earthquake: President Declares National Mourning As Death Toll Rises - Latest News 


Update/12:02 am: Noted that the Guardian has ended their minute by minute coverage, but are still offering updates of importance.

**********

Update/edit 09/21:

I should have added this last night, full coverage here: (also check other local TIJ/Ensenada news)




Frontera|Tags|Sismo


Interesting Report from TeleSur with pics and video:

Mexicans Organize Citizen Brigades After Earthquake As Distrust Towards Government Grows
 by, Carla Gonzalez

 end edit.

 Update:  Zeta has also had special ongoing coverage: (More Nationals on the sidebar)

Zeta

Sismo 19 de Septiembre


Check This One Out  - A quick pasted translation because I'm in a hurry and BTW these reports I have not seen in the USA corporate media at all:

From Zeta: 09/24/17

"Graco Ramirez es el Javier Duarte de Morelos": Javier Sicilia, Quien Recomienda Canalizar Viveres Hacia la Universidad Auto noma del Estado de Morelos
por, Enrique Mendoza Hernandez



Be careful Javier



"Graco Ramírez is Javier Duarte de Morelos": Javier Sicilia, who recommends channeling food to the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos



  • Following the 7.1-degree earthquake that shook Morelos, Puebla and Mexico City on Tuesday, September 19, 2017, the poet Javier Sicilia supported the denunciation made by the bishop of Cuernavaca, Ramón Castro y Castro, in the sense that the government Graced by Graco Ramirez, he monopolizes food through his political structure; so the writer said that one option is to channel humanitarian aid to the Autonomous University of the State Morelos (UAEM), as it has collection and distribution centers in 22 of the 33 municipalities of Morelos.
"It is true that the Graco Ramírez government is hoarding humanitarian aid, it is absolutely true; this man has an authoritarian political structure in the old style of the PRI to beat, control the media and kidnap, "ZETA Seminary Javier Sicilia told Sunday, September 24 after the bishop of Cuernavaca Ramón Castro y Castro reported that on Friday September 22, three trucks were stolen with provisions; even the singer Belinda also denounced the theft of a truck with humanitarian aid.


Sicilia expressed in an interview with this Weekly that the hoarding of bastidas by part of the political structure of the government of Graco Ramirez is with "truly electoral purposes", since its administration concludes in 2018, year in which there will also be elections to renew the governorship of Morelos:

 
"Graco Ramírez is politically dead at the federal level, his party (PRD) does not see it with good eyes, and what remained was the ruins of his kingdom, which he wants to perpetuate to cover his back with his stepson Rodrigo Gayosso, and this , the natural tragedy, is using it to cover his back in order to prop up Gayosso, who is the leader of the PRD in Morelos. The Graco has been a poor government with high crime rates, with clandestine graves product of the Prosecutor's Office, then now that this natural tragedy of the earthquake happens because it decides to hoard, that is, to exceed the citizenship in their moment of solidarity, and Graco decides in a false state imposition to hijack solidarity with truly electoral purposes. "

Warehouses allegedly hoarded by authorities
 
Given the hoarding of provisions by the political structure of the Graco Ramirez government, Javier Sicilia made two recommendations;

 First:"The recommendation is to denounce, to continue, not to be controlled by the State or by the parties, this is the moment of the citizens, it is the moment of solidarity, it is the moment to show that the State does not and that we create networks of solidarity to denounce these atrocities such as those committed by the government of Graco Ramírez. "


And secondly, in addition to directly bringing humanitarian aid to the villages of Morelos, another option is to channel food to the UAEM, which has a presence in 22 of the 33 municipalities in the state of Morelos:
 
"The most reliable institution now is the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, there they are carrying everything, we have a very good collection and distribution center, in addition the University is present in almost 33 municipalities; the University has a presence in 22 municipalities, there are also collection centers; now the University has become a point of reference, it is difficult to be touched because they immediately see.


Javier Sicilia detailed that in addition to Jojutla, where the earthquake of 7.1 degrees on Tuesday 19 September was the epicenter, other villages in the eastern part of Morelos adjacent to Puebla occupy 
humanitarian aid:
 
"The east of Morelos is very bad, in general the whole east is very devastated; everything is concentrated in Jojutla because it is a large population, then the ravages are very spectacular, but proportionately to the east, as in Tepalcingo, because the situation is so serious, Tepalcingo is a town of the Colony, was absolutely devastated; other villages such as Telela del Volcán, which is close to the border with Puebla, we have arrived with solidarity assistance, both the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos and other institutions such as UNAM.
 
"Right now Bishop Ramón Castro was revealing that 75 percent of religious architecture from the 16th to the 19th century is at risk; Until then, unfortunately, the INAH considers historical monuments, lacking the accounting of the twentieth century; then the religious heritage of 500 years is at risk, and this is amazing, because it means that an earthquake of this nature had not happened in 500 years. "
 
Finally, Javier Sicilia warned: "I am calling the Graco Ramírez party (PRD), a call to the federal authorities, because they continue to condone Graco Ramírez who is Javier Duarte de Morelos, the damage he is committing are immense, it is already time to stop it; Graco already has serious visions of what Duarte was in Veracruz. "


end edit.



**********

Although Trump did call Pena Nieto  and express his condolences this time around, why doesn't he just airlift down supplies/manpower for these people? They are screaming for help. These could be there in short hours. Just do it asshole.

Update 12:03am:  Well looks like he did do something, here is the press release:


USAID 09/20/17



**********

Slightly late and maybe USAID will be able to help
somewhat despite a very bad track record over the years.
 Several years back, Pando had a good expose of USAID;
the following reports are more recent, but you get the drift:

The Nation

A Brutal Expulsion in Guatemala
Shows How Neoliberalism Gets Greenwashed
by, Greg Grandin


 From JACOBIN:

USAID's Trojan Horse
by, Hilary Goodfriend


**********

Still, pray for everyone and no more huge disasters. Reports on the homicidios dolosos here will have to wait, they haven't stopped...they have increased.

***********

Just a reminder that El Chaparral/San Ysidro entry crossing will be closed this weekend into Monday, use the Otay crossing. The closure is due to the complete closure on the States side of 5 and 805 from 905 for 57 hours:

Closed:

Saturday 23 -- closed at 3:00 AM

Closed for 57 hours.

**********

Another Update: 09/24/17

GSA is opening up San Ysidro 12 hours earlier; in addition there will be four lanes open on the freeways going into Mexico instead of three:

Frontera - 09/24/17 4:30pm

GSA Reabrira San Ysidro 12 Horas Antes de lo Previsto




**********

P.S. Unsure when I'll return to the executions and violencia, the way the Mexican people are suffering from these quakes has knocked me off my feet.

The 7.1 Mexico Earthquake - Update: USAID - Update: Don't Forget To Use Otay This Weekend If You Are Crossing Into Mexico UPDATE: Have added Frontera & Zeta's Full and Ongoing Coverage - Don't Miss The Ones About Graco Ramirez and Theft/Hoarding of Supplies Meant For Earthquake Victims From Zeta --Update 9/24 : GSA Opening Up San Ysidro 12 Hours Earlier

Rescue teams from Tijuana and Ensenada are already on their way down to Mexico City to help in any way they can.  Meanwhile, there are established centers to drop off goods needed so badly locally:

Frontera

Decenas de Centros de Acopio se Instalan en Tijuana


For the latest up to date English reports & videos of the earthquake, we have been watching this:

The Guardian

Mexico Earthquake: President Declares National Mourning As Death Toll Rises - Latest News 


Update/12:02 am: Noted that the Guardian has ended their minute by minute coverage, but are still offering updates of importance.

**********

Update/edit 09/21:

I should have added this last night, full coverage here: (also check other local TIJ/Ensenada news)




Frontera|Tags|Sismo


Interesting Report from TeleSur with pics and video:

Mexicans Organize Citizen Brigades After Earthquake As Distrust Towards Government Grows
 by, Carla Gonzalez

 end edit.

 Update:  Zeta has also had special ongoing coverage: (More Nationals on the sidebar)

Zeta

Sismo 19 de Septiembre


Check This One Out  - A quick pasted translation because I'm in a hurry and BTW these reports I have not seen in the USA corporate media at all:

From Zeta: 09/24/17

"Graco Ramirez es el Javier Duarte de Morelos": Javier Sicilia, Quien Recomienda Canalizar Viveres Hacia la Universidad Auto noma del Estado de Morelos
por, Enrique Mendoza Hernandez



Be careful Javier



"Graco Ramírez is Javier Duarte de Morelos": Javier Sicilia, who recommends channeling food to the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos



  • Following the 7.1-degree earthquake that shook Morelos, Puebla and Mexico City on Tuesday, September 19, 2017, the poet Javier Sicilia supported the denunciation made by the bishop of Cuernavaca, Ramón Castro y Castro, in the sense that the government Graced by Graco Ramirez, he monopolizes food through his political structure; so the writer said that one option is to channel humanitarian aid to the Autonomous University of the State Morelos (UAEM), as it has collection and distribution centers in 22 of the 33 municipalities of Morelos.
"It is true that the Graco Ramírez government is hoarding humanitarian aid, it is absolutely true; this man has an authoritarian political structure in the old style of the PRI to beat, control the media and kidnap, "ZETA Seminary Javier Sicilia told Sunday, September 24 after the bishop of Cuernavaca Ramón Castro y Castro reported that on Friday September 22, three trucks were stolen with provisions; even the singer Belinda also denounced the theft of a truck with humanitarian aid.


Sicilia expressed in an interview with this Weekly that the hoarding of bastidas by part of the political structure of the government of Graco Ramirez is with "truly electoral purposes", since its administration concludes in 2018, year in which there will also be elections to renew the governorship of Morelos:

 
"Graco Ramírez is politically dead at the federal level, his party (PRD) does not see it with good eyes, and what remained was the ruins of his kingdom, which he wants to perpetuate to cover his back with his stepson Rodrigo Gayosso, and this , the natural tragedy, is using it to cover his back in order to prop up Gayosso, who is the leader of the PRD in Morelos. The Graco has been a poor government with high crime rates, with clandestine graves product of the Prosecutor's Office, then now that this natural tragedy of the earthquake happens because it decides to hoard, that is, to exceed the citizenship in their moment of solidarity, and Graco decides in a false state imposition to hijack solidarity with truly electoral purposes. "

Warehouses allegedly hoarded by authorities
 
Given the hoarding of provisions by the political structure of the Graco Ramirez government, Javier Sicilia made two recommendations;

 First:"The recommendation is to denounce, to continue, not to be controlled by the State or by the parties, this is the moment of the citizens, it is the moment of solidarity, it is the moment to show that the State does not and that we create networks of solidarity to denounce these atrocities such as those committed by the government of Graco Ramírez. "


And secondly, in addition to directly bringing humanitarian aid to the villages of Morelos, another option is to channel food to the UAEM, which has a presence in 22 of the 33 municipalities in the state of Morelos:
 
"The most reliable institution now is the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos, there they are carrying everything, we have a very good collection and distribution center, in addition the University is present in almost 33 municipalities; the University has a presence in 22 municipalities, there are also collection centers; now the University has become a point of reference, it is difficult to be touched because they immediately see.


Javier Sicilia detailed that in addition to Jojutla, where the earthquake of 7.1 degrees on Tuesday 19 September was the epicenter, other villages in the eastern part of Morelos adjacent to Puebla occupy 
humanitarian aid:
 
"The east of Morelos is very bad, in general the whole east is very devastated; everything is concentrated in Jojutla because it is a large population, then the ravages are very spectacular, but proportionately to the east, as in Tepalcingo, because the situation is so serious, Tepalcingo is a town of the Colony, was absolutely devastated; other villages such as Telela del Volcán, which is close to the border with Puebla, we have arrived with solidarity assistance, both the Autonomous University of the State of Morelos and other institutions such as UNAM.
 
"Right now Bishop Ramón Castro was revealing that 75 percent of religious architecture from the 16th to the 19th century is at risk; Until then, unfortunately, the INAH considers historical monuments, lacking the accounting of the twentieth century; then the religious heritage of 500 years is at risk, and this is amazing, because it means that an earthquake of this nature had not happened in 500 years. "
 
Finally, Javier Sicilia warned: "I am calling the Graco Ramírez party (PRD), a call to the federal authorities, because they continue to condone Graco Ramírez who is Javier Duarte de Morelos, the damage he is committing are immense, it is already time to stop it; Graco already has serious visions of what Duarte was in Veracruz. "


end edit.



**********

Although Trump did call Pena Nieto  and express his condolences this time around, why doesn't he just airlift down supplies/manpower for these people? They are screaming for help. These could be there in short hours. Just do it asshole.

Update 12:03am:  Well looks like he did do something, here is the press release:


USAID 09/20/17



**********

Slightly late and maybe USAID will be able to help
somewhat despite a very bad track record over the years.
 Several years back, Pando had a good expose of USAID;
the following reports are more recent, but you get the drift:

The Nation

A Brutal Expulsion in Guatemala
Shows How Neoliberalism Gets Greenwashed
by, Greg Grandin


 From JACOBIN:

USAID's Trojan Horse
by, Hilary Goodfriend


**********

Still, pray for everyone and no more huge disasters. Reports on the homicidios dolosos here will have to wait, they haven't stopped...they have increased.

***********

Just a reminder that El Chaparral/San Ysidro entry crossing will be closed this weekend into Monday, use the Otay crossing. The closure is due to the complete closure on the States side of 5 and 805 from 905 for 57 hours:

Closed:

Saturday 23 -- closed at 3:00 AM

Closed for 57 hours.

**********

Another Update: 09/24/17

GSA is opening up San Ysidro 12 hours earlier; in addition there will be four lanes open on the freeways going into Mexico instead of three:

Frontera - 09/24/17 4:30pm

GSA Reabrira San Ysidro 12 Horas Antes de lo Previsto




**********

P.S. Unsure when I'll return to the executions and violencia, the way the Mexican people are suffering from these quakes has knocked me off my feet.

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

The DACA Kids Fight Back & Paris Agreement-Accord Updates

How anyone could believe that Donald Trump actually "cares" for the DACA kids or his claims that he really "loves them" is too far reaching for me.  Where we left off last blog, most of us were confused to their future status despite an accord reached between Trump and the dinosaurs of the Democratic Party Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.  No details were made public, we were supposed to be mystified and relieved, even delighted.  But truthfully, it is difficult to trust any deals made by or with Trump, there's always an angle.

The DACA kids know the score and they blasted Pelosi out of the water:


"We are not your bargaining chip!" the group shouted while many held signs that read "Democrats Are Deporters" and "Fight 4 All 11 Million"—a reference to the full number of undocumented people estimated to live in the United States, as opposed to the approximately 800,000 who DACA is designed to protect. (Image: Screengrab/Twitter)


From Common Dreams: (with links to video within the report; don't miss all of their reports)

Refusing to Be Bargaining Chips, Dreamers Shut Down Pelosi's Pro-Dreamer Event


UPDATE/edit 09/20:  More on the Dreamers here:

DREAM ACT|Democracy Now

**********

THE PARIS AGREEMENT-ACCORD  (NRDC Summary within link)

Over the weekend, there was plenty of back and forth talk of Trump "re-joining" The Paris Accord.  First he was, then he wasn't, then he was and just a few hours ago, he wasn't. 

Gizmodo points out it was all spin.

Still, our first thoughts were what were his motives if he really should re-join?  We all know his first concern (other than himself) are the corporations and big banks and big oil, he doesn't give a shit about the environment; global warming he says is a "hoax."  His ratings are low, maybe after all the Hurricanes he was working the crowd ? Naomi Kline addresses his "position"  this morning; don't miss all the news at DN:

Democracy Now !

Naomi Kline Warns Europe May Water Down Paris Accord to Win Support From Trump 

 UPDATE - 09/20:

From The Intercept

The Paris Agreement Disputes Is a Distraction. The Real Battle Is Playing Out In The EPA
by, Kate Aronoff

**********

Probably one of the best don't miss reports on the environment (then again I'm a Chris Hedges fan); don't miss all of their reports:

From  Moyers & Company

The Great Flood
By, Chris Hedges - 09/12/17


**********


I'll be back with the latest homicidios dolosos stats, there are so many dead people it is becoming a blur; we are somewhere over one hundred just in TIJ this month.

 Meanwhile, here's an oldie but a goodie to hold you over:

The DACA Kids Fight Back & Paris Agreement-Accord Updates

How anyone could believe that Donald Trump actually "cares" for the DACA kids or his claims that he really "loves them" is too far reaching for me.  Where we left off last blog, most of us were confused to their future status despite an accord reached between Trump and the dinosaurs of the Democratic Party Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.  No details were made public, we were supposed to be mystified and relieved, even delighted.  But truthfully, it is difficult to trust any deals made by or with Trump, there's always an angle.

The DACA kids know the score and they blasted Pelosi out of the water:


"We are not your bargaining chip!" the group shouted while many held signs that read "Democrats Are Deporters" and "Fight 4 All 11 Million"—a reference to the full number of undocumented people estimated to live in the United States, as opposed to the approximately 800,000 who DACA is designed to protect. (Image: Screengrab/Twitter)


From Common Dreams: (with links to video within the report; don't miss all of their reports)

Refusing to Be Bargaining Chips, Dreamers Shut Down Pelosi's Pro-Dreamer Event


UPDATE/edit 09/20:  More on the Dreamers here:

DREAM ACT|Democracy Now

**********

THE PARIS AGREEMENT-ACCORD  (NRDC Summary within link)

Over the weekend, there was plenty of back and forth talk of Trump "re-joining" The Paris Accord.  First he was, then he wasn't, then he was and just a few hours ago, he wasn't. 

Gizmodo points out it was all spin.

Still, our first thoughts were what were his motives if he really should re-join?  We all know his first concern (other than himself) are the corporations and big banks and big oil, he doesn't give a shit about the environment; global warming he says is a "hoax."  His ratings are low, maybe after all the Hurricanes he was working the crowd ? Naomi Kline addresses his "position"  this morning; don't miss all the news at DN:

Democracy Now !

Naomi Kline Warns Europe May Water Down Paris Accord to Win Support From Trump 

 UPDATE - 09/20:

From The Intercept

The Paris Agreement Disputes Is a Distraction. The Real Battle Is Playing Out In The EPA
by, Kate Aronoff

**********

Probably one of the best don't miss reports on the environment (then again I'm a Chris Hedges fan); don't miss all of their reports:

From  Moyers & Company

The Great Flood
By, Chris Hedges - 09/12/17


**********


I'll be back with the latest homicidios dolosos stats, there are so many dead people it is becoming a blur; we are somewhere over one hundred just in TIJ this month.

 Meanwhile, here's an oldie but a goodie to hold you over: