Translate

Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Zelensky Picks Up An Amigo

 

Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei & Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky


In a surprise move to most of us not deeply involved with US and World Statesmanship, Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei joined  the  forces of solidarity with the Ukraine. After non-intervention as far as even emotional support for the Ukraine and the Summit of the Americas where Guatemala along with Mexico and others declined to attend, the layman's attitude towards these non-attendees was, well, that's it for them.

Interestingly, just recently reported is that DHS secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is on his way to Honduras to meet with President Iris Xiomara Castro Sarmiento to discuss migration challenges: 

 ~ From Border Report:

Mayorkas Traveling to Meet With Honduran President 

 Are we seeing a trend - or a shift in attitude towards the Ukraine from our neighbors to the south? Well don't count on it completely...yet....if ever.

Still, compare the vote outcome from the OAS Declaration of 02/25/22 and Guatemala's positions which are completely in line with what Giammattei said in this AP interview:

  ~ From AP:

Guatemala's President Visits Ukraine, Expresses Solidarity

 "GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei visited Ukraine on Monday and expressed his solidarity with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Giammattei met with Zelenskyy in the capital, Kyiv, becoming the first Latin American president to make the trip.

Many Latin American leaders have avoided taking a stance on the Russian invasion of Ukraine. That reflects in some cases decades-old ties to Russia and in others a wariness of U.S. foreign policy goals.

“We stand in solidarity with the Ukrainian people, who have resisted with courage,” Giammattei said at a joint news conference. “As long as human lives are lost, we cannot silence our voices.”

“Let it be clear that since the beginning of this conflict, Guatemala has raised its voice,” he said. “We will always be consistent with our words. Guatemala does not and will not remain silent.

Zelenskyy thanked Giammattei for his support for sanctions on Russia and Guatemala’s support for an international tribunal on crimes committed during the war. 

Ukraine’s president noted that Latin America, like many other parts of the world, has suffered from higher prices due to the fighting in Ukriane, which is a big producer of agricultural and other commodities.  

“Only together can we protect our world,” Zelenskyy said.

Critics of Giammattei’s government said the president has more pressing issues he should be dealing with at home, including corruption and human rights.

“The entire world knows the way in which President Alejandro Giammattei has been eroding democracy and promoting impunity in his country. One trip to Ukraine is not going to change that reality,” said Carolina Jiménez, president of the Washington Office on Latin America.

The U.S. government has sharply criticized the weakening of anti-corruption efforts in Guatemala and last year cancelled the U.S. visa of Guatemalan Attorney General Consuelo Porras, who has been pursuing former prosecutors.

Instead of going after corruption, the government has been filing legal charges against the former anti-corruption officials themselves, and more than 20 of them have fled the country.

Giammattei’s government and prosecutors accelerated efforts begun by his predecessor to undo a U.N.-backed anti-corruption campaign that put several top officials, including former presidents, behind bars. They say those prosecutions themselves were irregular."

~~~~~

 How bad is it in Guatemala ?

I'm not sure we need to go back to 1954 - maybe at a later date - but it's been rough. The most current update to 2020 (two years shy) that I could find is here: Guatemala Profile/Timeline.

But that and other timelines fall short of what exactly is between the lines.

Take drugs and drug violence, for example:



  ~ From Insight Crime:

 

 The Jalisco Cartel's Quiet Expansion in Guatemala

 

18 MAY 2022 BY ALEX PAPADOVASSILAKIS

 

~~~~~ 

The Food Crisis

In the past couple of months we really did not hear much of anything from Mexico and the Latin American countries, including Guatemala, when Russian forces were stealing, just driving off with thousands and thousands of dollars worth of Ukrainian much needed farm equipment, not to mention stealing tons of grain; and recently after targeting northernmost cities, hospitals and schools killing civilians in a terrorist rage and reneging on an accord to allow safe passage of grain through the Black Sea by bombing the port at Odessa & Mykolaiv they have created yet more bloody barbarian twisted disasters. Such liars and deviants. What do these events tell you about Putin and all of the countries in the world who absolutely refuse to condemn him? Fuck them.

But the  Russian sting, and the holding of the world as hostage to Putin's war is having sinister and disgusting effects - Putin intends to starve (or freeze) everyone he can to get his way. Just like Stalin. Wake up Mexico !

 ~ From: The Progressive Magazine  (mind you, this was printed last March)

" The Guatemalan government has taken steps to hide the realities of the impact of poverty on the country. In 2020, the government of Alejandro Giammattei censored the publication of a study by the United Nations Development Programme’s 2020 National Human Development Report, which painted a bleak image of the country. The document, however, was later released in February 2022 through the Guatemala Leaks project, which includes Guatemalan independent media outlets No Ficción, Plaza Publica, and Agencia Ocote. "

 

The Other Americans: Russia's Invasion of Ukraine Is Hurting Guatemalans Poor 

by

 

 

~~~~~

Some charts and downloads for y'all

 ~ From the Visual Capitalist:

3 Reasons For The Fertilizer & Food Shortage 

Published

on

~~~~~

 

 ~ From Reliefweb: (Download Original Report on link)

Global Hunger Crisis:Guatemala, Honduras and Ecuador

 Analysis

 ~~~~~ 

 Latest Updates on Ukraine:

Someone turned off the gas !

CNN: Russia's War In Ukraine

Updated 4:01 p.m. ET, July 26, 2022


Good video interview with retired Lt. General Mark Hertling on upcoming "inflection point"which could spell big trouble for the Russians on the link:

 

 CNN: July 25, 2022 Russia-Ukraine News 

 

~~~~~

 

Meanwhile,  somethings to hold you over:

 

Human Rights Watch - Guatemala Events of 2021 

 

Guatemala Food Security Outlook 

 

Guatemala Travel Advisory from the US State Department


US Financial Aid To Guatemala

"Guatemala receives an average of $178,236,292 in foreign aid from the US per year. According to the data on US foreign aid per country, in the last two decades, Guatemala has received billions of dollars in aid from the US government with the aim to develop the country's overall economic and political environment.Nov 22, 2021"
 
Additionally,
"The U.S. Government has provided $26.4 million to El Salvador, $81.5 million to Guatemala, and $57.1 million to Honduras to support the fight against COVID-19 and strengthen health systems.Apr 19, 2022"
 
Keep in mind as you are reading through the White House Report, that AMLO  really does not like USAID - so does that mean he's going to help out Guatemala and give them monetary and other support ? I don't think so Joe.
 
 
 ~ From The White House: 
 
 
Statements and Releases 
  
~~~~~
 
The other side...COHA is throwing interference:
 
 ~ From COHA:
 
 
  
By Patrick Synan
Boston
 
Excerpt:

"Guatemala

Guatemala, typically the largest recipient of CARSI funds,[31] has appeared yearly on the World Report since the 1990’s. Prior to 2010, reports generally portrayed a society engaged in a hard struggle to heal after decades of civil war. However, a continuing feature of this struggle was the state’s inability to hold the military accountable for crimes against civilians. Reports from 2006 to 2009 open with virtually the same five paragraphs:

“A dozen years after the end of Guatemala’s brutal civil war, impunity remains the norm when it comes to human rights violations. Ongoing violence and intimidation threaten to reverse the little progress that has been made toward promoting accountability. Guatemala’s weak and corrupt law enforcement institutions have proved incapable of containing the powerful organized crime groups that, among other things, are believed to be responsible for attacks on human rights defenders, judges, prosecutors, and others.

Guatemala continues to suffer the effects of an internal armed conflict that ended in 1996. A United Nations-sponsored truth commission estimated that as many as 200,000 people were killed during the 36-year war, and attributed the vast majority of the killings to government forces.

Guatemalans seeking accountability for these abuses face daunting obstacles. Prosecutors and investigators receive grossly inadequate training and resources. The courts routinely fail to resolve judicial appeals and motions in a timely manner, allowing defense attorneys to engage in dilatory legal maneuvering. The army and other state institutions resist cooperating fully with investigations into abuses committed by current or former members. And the police regularly fail to provide adequate protection to judges, prosecutors, and witnesses involved in politically sensitive cases.

Of the 626 massacres documented by the truth commission, only three cases have been successfully prosecuted in the Guatemalan courts. The third conviction came in May 2008, when five former members of a paramilitary “civil patrol” were convicted for the murders of 26 of the 177 civilians massacred in Rio Negro in 1982.

The July 2005 discovery of approximately 80 million documents of the disbanded National Police, including files on Guatemalans who were murdered and “disappeared” during the armed conflict, could play a key role in the prosecution of those who committed human rights abuses during the conflict. By October 2008 …the country’s Human Rights Ombudsman’s Office had processed seven million of those documents, primarily related to cases presently under active investigation. The office plans to open the first part of the archive in 2009.”[32]

Each of these documents identifies a perpetually weak judicial system and frightened civil societies fumbling in the shadow of an untouchable military and police force. Furthermore, the nearly identical text over four years suggests that no immediate improvements were likely without international pressure. But it isn’t obvious how channeling funds to an army that “resist[s] cooperating” and police who “routinely fail to provide adequate protection” would solve these issues. Subsequent reports do not tell a tale of success.

Far from being a repeat of the previous four years, the 2010 World Report shows an even further decline in the state of human rights in Guatemala. The summary of the section reads:

“Guatemala’s weak and corrupt law enforcement institutions have proved incapable of containing the powerful organized crime groups and criminal gangs that contribute to Guatemala having one the highest violent crime rates in the Americas. Illegal armed groups, which appear to have evolved in part from counterinsurgency forces operating during the civil war that ended in 1996, are believed to be responsible for targeted attacks on civil society actors and justice officials. More than a decade after the end of the conflict, impunity remains the norm when it comes to human rights violations. The ongoing violence and intimidation threaten to reverse the little progress that has been made toward promoting accountability.”[33]

Rather than aiding military and law enforcement officials in addressing violence and organized crime, CARSI coincided with the strengthening of “illegal armed groups” with ties to military forces. The 2011 Report describes military efforts to address gang violence resulting in “social cleansing.” In other words, the detention and/or disappearance of union organizers and social activists,[34] The 2012 Report describes similar activity.[35]

According to the 2013 Report, “President Otto Pérez Molina (…) increasingly used the Guatemalan military in public security operations, despite the serious human rights violations it committed during the country’s civil war.”[36] This tendency was identified again in 2014.[37] In 2015, HRW found that a force of 20,000 armed service members was active in a country whose territory measures 42,000 square miles.[38]

In a 2015 observation report, the IACHR echoes HRW’s concerns about the state’s overreliance on the military to address domestic security challenges; in response it recommends a “return to the police reform agenda, specifically the plan named ‘The Police We Want.’”[39] This is a particularly intriguing recommendation because “The Police We Want” is published by USAID, the organization through which CARSI funds are channeled. However, further IACHR reporting offers no indication that its recommendation was followed.

The USAID plan was supposed to operate from 2012 to 2020, but in 2014 a new framework for police reform emerged. The Integral Police Model for Community Security (MOPSIC) prioritized community-oriented policing (COP). According to Arturo Matute of the University of the Valley of Guatemala, it was popular among some of the largest foreign aid organizations operating in Guatemala.

“The donor community has backed preventive strategies in the police through the years, including the development of MOPSIC. The U.S. has provided the largest amounts of financial support through the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).”[40]

Despite the promising nature of the framework, however, the rollout of MOPSIC has been weak. Matute observes that presently, “police agents are scarcely trained in it.”[41]

Despite the inefficacy of police reform, there were some advances in the justice system between 2013 and 2019. The World Reports during this timeframe applaud a series of high-level convictions. In 2013, former president Efrain Ríos Montt was found guilty of crimes against humanity and genocide. In 2015, Otto Pérez Molina was implicated in a tax fraud scandal and resigned. The major force behind this discovery was the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG), a UN-led investigative team operating in Guatemala since 2006 with a mandate to examine high level corruption cases. The 2016 World Report acknowledged this significant step forward along with restrictions on U.S. aid to Guatemala under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 (this provision had a limited effect on CARSI funds).[42] For a few short years, accountability appeared on the horizon.

The IACHR also expressed some cautious optimism in its 2015 report, writing: “ The IACHR notes changes in favor of a society committed with human rights, promoted by the work of public officials compromised with justice and human rights defenders as well as social leaders. The support of international human rights agencies, as well as the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG, for its acronym in Spanish), has been critical to those efforts.”[43]

The momentum dissipated, however, in 2018 when Jimmy Morales “flanked by military and police officers, announced that he would not renew CICIG’s mandate when it expire[d] (…) in September 2019. The following week, he announced that he had prohibited CICIG Commissioner Iván Velásquez—who was on a work trip abroad—from re-entering the country.”[44] This was the beginning of a political purge that only advanced in both speed and intensity during the Giamattei administration under the Attorney Generalship of Consuelo Porras.

The current state of Guatemala is quite grim. Far from witnessing a reduction in crime and gang violence since CARSI was first enacted (despite the package’s stated purpose of addressing these problems), the country now faces a regime dedicated to erasing the branches of state that could make any positive difference. Like Secretary Blinken, the most recent HRW World Report condemns the dissolution of anti-corruption institutions by Consuelo Porras and Giamattei. Neither the White House nor Human Rights Watch, however, mentions the uninterrupted flow of military funding.[45]"

 

~~~~~

  Well, let's wait & see what Catherine Osborn has to say in the next few days.

 

Mexico, Mexico, Mexico.....

 And go here for the latest on Mexico - Best reports on the USMCA, energy policies, todo los !! Sign up for their emails ! I don't think you can get anymore current than this site, excellent reports and clarifications:

 Pulse News Mexico 

~~~~~

Locally que paso ?

 Well, so far there has not been any coverage in Zeta over Guatemala's realignment on the world stage.

However, in Tijuana this month of July, we are up to 148 executions, giving the YTD total in TIJ at 1,058 dead.

 ~ From Zeta:

Suman 148 Homicidios en Julio en Tijuana

 Destacados martes, 26 julio, 2022 1:02 PM

 

~~~~~

  An oldie but a goodie, Marimba didn't seem too popular:

.......


over & out for now

Sunday, July 24, 2022

The Running Kind....


 

Just a quickie because we needed some memes and some music ! Plus, completely late on this one but I have an excuse !

Everywhere I looked,  Josh Hawley was the object of ridicule, and for good reasons. So here's the best take:

 

  From Informed Comment: With video on the link

 Hollow Men: All The Cowards of Jan 6 


"Ann Arbor (Informed Comment) – The damning Jan. 6 public hearings revealed a plethora of historical detail, but they also shed light on character. Some of these revelations were profiles in pusillanimity.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), one of the slimiest creatures ever to crawl into the halls of America’s legislature, gloried in a raised fist toward the assembled fascist hordes of the far right summoned by the lunatic-in-chief. A member of the DC police told the committee that she found the gesture deeply offensive, more especially since Hawley thought himself safe in the halls of Congress after having riled up a crowd she had to face (and which gave Officer Brian Sicknick two fatal strokes after nearly crushing him to death in a doorway to the Capitol– while injuring 146 other policemen).

When the crowd he had helped instigate invaded his supposedly safe space, did Hawley greet them with another raised fist? Did he join them in their mission?

No.

He lit out like a craven poltroon, whose frantic flight is impossible to watch without a melancholy hilarity. The mirth wells up from the Warner Brothers cartoon-like reversal that led to his frantic flight, the melancholy from watching a benighted fool to whom the misguided people of Missouri had unwisely entrusted their fates.

I propose that we alter the American idiom “to haul ass” from now on, substituting “to hawley ass.”

Trump himself, having lit the fuse, allowed himself to be squirreled away back at the Fox News situation room in the White House, rather than leading the crowd, as he had promised to do. One does not lead from a vehicle, and Trump knew his Secret Service agents would never let him be driven into the midst of a mob, so whatever drama he staged was a mere matter of protesting too much. He could have gone to the Capitol if he had really wanted too. He was still the most powerful man in the world. He chose to let his useful idiots take the heat, and has not gone to visit any of them in jail after they were quite rightly convicted of every crime from seditious conspiracy to trespassing.

There were the Republican members of Congress, who, having been spirited away into tunnels and undisclosed locations, fleeing with all the alacrity of a panic-stricked hawleyism from the QAnon Shaman and other assorted gun nuts, turned around and voted to overthrow the US government by refusing to certify Joe Biden’s win, and ever after suffered the vapors, wrist to pasty forehead, at the very thought of censuring the Apricot Adolf.

Then, take Steve Bannon– please! Here is a blowhard who urged on Trump and the insurrectionists and blew off a subpoena from the Jan. 6 committee. When he was indicted and faced a courtroom, he thundered, as Jose Paglieri points out at the Daily Beast, that he would make the trial “the misdemeanor of hell.” In the event, he did did not take the stand to denounce the perfidious proceedings for his three-sheets-to the-wind geriatric YouTube audience. He did not have his attorneys even put on a defense, and skipped attending himself, too bashful to withstand the stern gaze of the judge. T.S. Eliot in The Hollow Men, observed, “This is the way the world ends, not with a bang but a whimper.” Eliot was haunted by the figure of Kurtz in Joseph Conrad’s novel of the European colonial rape of the Congo, The Heart of Darkness. The Hollow Men of the black shirt Trump insurgency have also dwindled from a roar at their predation upon the nation to the mewling of broken clowns hawking snake oil at a brigade of gullible washouts. The horror, the horror, indeed.

The gallery of the yellow-bellied goes on, including Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy, who briefly found their cojones somehow with a flashlight under the covers after four years of suffering from cryptorchidism, and managed to at least protest that Trump had nearly succeeded in having them lynched. After this momentary brush with manhood, they quickly turned choirboy in the church of Trump, praising him and seeking his approval, for all the world as though the Munich city elders had sucked up to Hitler after the failed beer-hall putsch.

Most Republican senators refused even to meet with Brian Sicknick’s mother Gladys when she lobbied them to form a commission to investigate Jan. 6. Even the dozen, out of 50, GOP senators who did meet with her voted against the commission. If it hadn’t been for the courage of Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, with whom I likely agree on very little else, in joining Nancy Pelosi’s Jan. 6 Special Committee, the entire exercise could have been dismissed as Democrat (that’s what they call them) partisanship.

Much of the Republican Party has been reduced to quivering protoplasm, whimpering under the lash of Trump’s whiny invective, alternating between morbid algolagnia and contemptible dastardliness."

 

 Mahvelous dahling...and your proposal has come to light:

 


 

 I have more...






 Seriously....

 

I know he's a friend of Margaret Thatcher...still, advise coming from a former Trump "insider" is well worth paying attention to these days. Too bad he can't bring himself to do a report on Trump the Nazi maniac. Oh well.


 

good one.....


 

~~~~~

But wait, there's more...Josh wants all of us to know how brave he really is, that he is not going to back down, he's a fighter ! 


From Business Insider:

Josh Hawley Responds To Video-Turned Meme of Him Running Away From a Pro-Trump Mob on Jan 6 Saying He Won't Run From Feud With 'Liberals' 

"Republican Sen. Josh Hawley said he won't "run away" from his feud with liberals a day after the January 6 committee presented a video of him running away from a pro-Trump crowd during the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. 

"And I just want to say to all of those liberals out there and the liberal media, just in case you haven't gotten the message yet, I do not regret it," Hawley said during a speech at Turning Point USA's conference in Florida on Friday. "And I am not backing down. I'm not gonna apologize, I'm not gonna cower, I'm not gonna run from you."

Hawley was referencing being called a "traitor" for pushing for "election integrity" last year, referencing his "objection" to certifying the election last year.

Hawley's remarks come in contrast to footage played the night before by the January 6 committee showing the Missouri senator fleeing a Trump crowd on the day of the riot. The footage ricocheted across social media and quickly became a meme making fun of the senator. 

The committee pointed out the irony in the video since Hawley was seen earlier riling up the crowd and raising his fist to protesters in solidarity. 

"Senator Josh Hawley also had to flee," said Rep. Elaine Luria, a Virginia Democrat, who is helping lead Thursday's hearing. "Earlier that afternoon before the joint session started he walked across the East Front of the Capitol, as you can see in this photo, he raised his fist in solidarity with the protesters already amassing at the security gates."

Hawley has previously defended his actions on January 6. "

 ~~~~~

No disrespect intended to Merle Haggard, but Josh Hawley, a good ole white boy, is indeed a wimp.


............

Goodnight y'all.

🙀

Friday, July 22, 2022

January 6th Committee: Numero Ocho

 


Maybe it wasn't "Dereliction of Duty" in the legal sense, but it was scary and the hallmark of a psycho:

 

  ~ From The Conversation: 

 Why Donald Trump Can't Be Prosecuted For 'Dereliction of Duty' For His Inaction On Jan.6

 

By,

Professor of Law, United States Military Academy West Point

 

"During the prime-time hearing on July 21, 2022 of the House January 6 committee, the two panel members leading the hearing used the phrase “dereliction of duty” to describe the conduct of then-President Donald Trump.

Trump “was told by everyone to halt the violence,” Rep. Elaine Luria, a Democrat from Virginia, said. “But he refused to do anything…It was a dereliction of duty.”

GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois also described Trump’s inaction as a “dereliction of duty.”

“President Trump did not fail to act,” Kinzinger said. “He chose not to act.”

They echoed the media pundits, politicians and others who are using the same term, “dereliction of duty” to describe Trump’s inaction on Jan. 6, 2021.

The justification for using that term is that Trump encouraged attendees at a rally to march on the Capitol and then failed to do anything to stop the violence once they had invaded the U.S. Capitol building, despite the pleas of his staff, political leaders and his family to do so.

Committee Chairman U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Democrat from Mississippi, didn’t use “dereliction of duty,” but he detailed Trump’s inaction for 187 minutes between the time the president ended his speech at the rally near the White House at 1:10 p.m. and when he asked the rioters to leave in a video taped message from the Rose Garden at 4:17 p.m.

“Even though he was the only person in the world that could call off the mob he sent to the U.S. Capitol,” Thompson said, “he could not be moved to rise from his dining room table, and walk the few steps down the White House hallway, into the press briefing room, where cameras were anxiously, and desperately, waiting to carry his message to the armed and violent mob.”

Given that most people believe dereliction of duty is a failure to take action that is legally required, the phrase can be used in this context to summarize a broader behavior and offer a way to cast blame.

As a former prosecutor in New York City and a professor of law at West Point, I believe that most people find solace in casting the most disparaging label possible upon an adversary.

The House committee investigating President Trump’s actions on Jan. 6 may find that he did not fulfill his duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” a requirement of each president, detailed in Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution.

The committee might find – and it apparently has, based on testimony presented throughout its hearings – that Trump’s failure to ensure that rioters would not storm the Capitol, and his failure to stop them once they were there, amounted to a dereliction of duty in an informal or colloquial sense.

But this is not an actual crime that could be applied to a president.

Moral judgment, not legal

While some states, such as Ohio, Texas and Virginia, have a crime titled dereliction or neglect of duty, the concept is better known in military law, where a federal criminal statute prohibits a member of the military from being “derelict in the performance of his duties.”

Under this statute, a soldier, for example, can be found guilty of a crime if the soldier failed to take an action that he or she was legally required to take, such as charging a hill following the order of a commander.

The House committee may conclude that President Trump failed to act by not stopping the rioters, which might be considered a violation of his responsibility under the Constitution.

But in my view, this would not be a criminal dereliction of duty.

The reason is that though a president is commander in chief of the military, he is a civilian and not a member of the military.

As a result, he is not subject to military law.

Federal criminal law does not contain a dereliction of duty statute.

Any state dereliction of duty laws, regardless of their elements, cannot apply to President Trump because on Jan. 6 he was in Washington, D.C. – not in any state, and D.C. doesn’t have one of its own.

A more precise way to consider the legality of President Trump’s conduct on Jan. 6 is to determine whether he wanted the rioters to commit a criminal act and engaged in some speech or behavior that urged them to do so or assisted them in some way.

In that sense, the House Committee might find that the President was derelict.

But that finding would be a label of moral or social disapproval, not a description of a criminal offense."

Anyone out there who believes Trump will face no charges at all ? And, if he doesn't what next ?

~~~~~

Just in case, if you missed it: from the Washington Post with commentary:

.

...........


  ~  From CNN:

 Takeaways From The January 6 Hearings Day 8 

 

 

 

 

 In Pictures: The January 6 Hearings

Updated 12:05 AM ET, Fri July 22, 2022

 

 

~~~~~

 

Over & out for now... going to try to soak my knee in the Dead Sea Salts.

 

 

Sunday, July 17, 2022

But I Wanted to Meet Dexter the Dog.....

Everything changed around here after the 4th of July. I am now using a walker ( the el cheapo model) because the knee finally gave out. I managed and not very well to get down here using a cane, it's pretty bad. The pain is unreal, but I can't take the pain meds, they make me sick. Tonight I investigated "Boswellia Serrata" and I'm looking at two different brands: Amandean & Zazzee, will order tomorrow. And this, just as everything in the world is happening. 

Still, go here for news on Mexico:

 Pulse News Mexico

Snazy little piece on Todos Santos which almost seems to make things seem normal. I need to send Sherry the directions to Mike Doyle's  (RIP) place at Cabo...she could take lessons there next time.

 

Locally of course...although there isn't a great deal of talk on the COVID Variant B-5 which is not so silently lurking all around the world ...  we are in the high 70's this month as far as the executions go. Luckily, no hot weather...but wow have you been following all the earthquakes from Borrego Springs up into Los Angeles?

 

 Zeta Tijuana

 

~~~~~ 

A reminder that on Tuesday the Hearings begin again, it will be interesting to see if the Secret Service weasels out and tries to explain the missing correspondence during the Trump melt down as simply a snafu..and surely this time around, it will be more than 18.5 minutes missing. Talk about a playbook.

Let's talk about Dexter.

A bit over two weeks ago, I first met Dexter:


............


So, when Mike told me I could choose a spot for a vacation after the surgery and I'm able to walk again, I decided that Ouray is where I wanted to go. For the past two weeks laying in bed or on the sofa I've been investigating  and dreaming about Ouray - everything, the weather, property, cost of living, housing, camping (bears!), hotels and motels, food, you name it. And it is a beautiful place, it's a tourist trap, but wow. It makes you think you could actually live in the snow for months and months ! Ah, but the hot springs - not only there but everywhere. And Dexter, I could just kiss that little guy !

 


 

 The good news that I read was that 58% of the people in Ouray voted Democrat last election, but there are some problems like a housing shortage. Workers in Ouray are hard pressed to find affordable housing in the town, and forget about commuting from Telluride, that is completely unaffordable. If you could afford housing in Ouray, you would have to drive up to Montrose, 40 miles north to get groceries  and supplies as well as medical services. 

What if you don't like wearing boots? I didn't see any pictures of people wearing flip flops. But they say that Ouray is an anti-ski town, which sounds interesting...instead they like to hike and climb ice mountains. There are mine tours, but the places I would like to see are the cave of the winds where the Apaches believed the Great Spirit of the wind lived,and the Whispering Cave - but those are located in different areas. I imagine even though the taxes are low your utility bill for heating then cooling in the summer would send you screaming down Main Street. Most of those old and beautiful Victorians were never insulated. RV's are not allowed to drive around in town, nor are ATV's which is good news, but there are a lot of jeeps.

Could you live in the cold and snow for months and months and months ? But more importantly, could you live in a state where just about everyone is packing some kind of gun?  How about this:

 ~ From Denver 7:

 Extremism Is On the Rise In Colorado and Across the Country 

 By: Meghan Lopez

Posted at 5:50 PM, Jul 12, 2022
and last updated 5:17 PM, Jul 12, 2022

 

Look up gun violence in Colorado and maybe you will be just as shocked as I was. Here is a current example:

 

 ~ From  The Gazette:

After Multiple Shootings in Colorado Springs Neighborhood, Residents and Bar Owner Have Had Enough 

  • Updated  

  •  

    ~~~~~

     



     

     It wouldn't be fair to generalize that Colorado is full of gun swingin cowboys, but the romance and mystique of the old west (at least for the locals), has been well established since childhood and old dreams die hard. Well shucks, even in Ouray, where John Wayne filmed parts of "True Grit" they say he left his hat at the Outlaw Bar & Grill. And it is still there, behind the bar. They'll even let you try it on.

    Still, it is a gorgeous place, almost unreal like Disneyland. 

    Oh Dexter, I'll see you in my dreams sweetie.

     ~~~~~

     

    P.S. Make sure you get your boosters, the variant is creeping in and yes, Putin is a terrorist. Maybe I'll get lucky and after surgery, Mike will get this walker for me:




    See ya'll later dudes. 

    Friday, July 1, 2022

    The Supreme Court Is On A Rampage And We Are In Deep Shit - What's Next ? - Local Mayhem Including Attacks on the Policia


     
    There ain't no such thing as clean coal

     

     ~  From CNN:

     

    The Supreme Court's Conservative Majority Is A Threat To The World 

     

    Updated 12:02 AM ET, Fri July 1, 2022

     " The Supreme Court spent recent weeks triggering political and legal earthquakes across America. But its latest audacious blow could affect the entire planet.

    After advancing the Republican Party's agenda by overturning the federal right to an abortion and loosening gun laws, the conservative court majority built by former President Donald Trump on Thursday limited the government's capacity to fight climate change.
     
    In a 6-3 ruling, the justices held that US law did not give the Environmental Protection Agency the authority to set caps on planet-warming emissions from power plants. Given that President Joe Biden's $500 billion energy and climate plan is stuck in the Senate, the move dealt a significant blow to US global leadership on the issue.
     
    The decision came down at a moment when scientists are warning of the disastrous impacts of accelerating climate change and as raging wildfires and parching droughts in the US show that the crisis is already here. And it was especially dismaying to the White House since it threatened to weaken Biden's authority on the global stage just as he was wrapping up a successful trip to Europe. The President collected several big wins, including solidifying NATO's front against Russia, by brokering the entry of two new members -- Sweden and Finland -- and by orienting the alliance to further another key priority: building a front of international democracies to counter China. 
     
    But his credibility on combating climate change -- another key foreign policy priority -- was dented by the Supreme Court ruling, even if administration lawyers will seek alternative ways to cut emissions and global market forces continue to make coal-fired power stations unprofitable or obsolete.
     
    Global climate action depends on a collective effort. Smaller countries won't cut their emissions if the biggest polluters, like the US, won't. The tough political choices required to cut emissions are impossible for all to make if some nations avoid them. And other powers will constrain their own climate targets if they fear losing a competitive advantage to rivals that don't change their economies to lower reliance on fossil fuels. If Biden's capacity to reach ambitious US climate goals is compromised, he will be unable to lead by example and an already creaky plan to avert catastrophic warming across the globe could be in jeopardy. 
     
    The United Nations was quick to warn Thursday that the Supreme Court's decision threatened to disrupt efforts to keep the rise in global temperatures below 2% while pursuing efforts to maintain a 1.5% threshold.
     
    "Decisions like today's in the US, or any other major emitting economy, make it harder to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement, for a healthy, livable planet, especially as we need to accelerate the phase out of coal and the transition to renewable energies," said Stéphane Dujarric, the spokesman for UN Secretary-General António Guterres.
     
    "But we also need to remember that an emergency as global in nature as climate change requires a global response, and the actions of a single nation should not and cannot make or break whether we reach our climate objectives."
     
     

    US climate change leadership has often been erratic

    The world is used to US gyrations on climate change. 
     
    President Barack Obama, for example, helped negotiate the Paris climate accord, which came into force in 2016. But his successor, President Donald Trump, who had previously declared climate change to be a Chinese hoax, walked out on the deal. Declaring "America is back," Biden took steps to rejoin the agreement within hours of being sworn in as president last year. 
     
    The Supreme Court's move throws a wrench in Biden's ambitious plans to halve US greenhouse gas emissions from 2005 levels by 2030 and to create a net-zero emissions economy by 2050.
    "This has certainly made it much, much more difficult without a doubt," Carol Browner, who served as EPA administrator in the Clinton administration, told CNN on Thursday after the Supreme Court opinion was released.
     
    In essence, the court ruled that the Clean Air Act did not give the EPA the authority to regulate the carbon emissions from power plants that contribute to climate change. Because the law was enacted in 1970, it did not contain detailed instructions for the agency to combat climate change, which, at the time, was not a widespread global concern. 
     
    Chief Justice John Roberts argued in his majority opinion that the act could not be used by the government as authority to introduce curbs to combat climate change.
     
    "Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible 'solution to the crisis of the day,'" Roberts wrote in his majority opinion. "But it is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme."
     
    This is just the latest case when the Supreme Court's narrow, literal reading of the Constitution and US law has appeared to pay little attention to conditions in the modern world and how the majority's decisions would impact them.
     
    Last week's overturning of the constitutional right to an abortion, for instance, has created chaotic aftereffects and a patchwork of laws across the nation. An earlier decision to strike down a law in New York state that placed limits on the right of Americans to carry guns outside the home came as crime is rising in a nation already awash with guns. 
     
    In her dissent to the Roberts opinion, Justice Elena Kagan, who was nominated by Obama, described a dire picture of a warming world with intense hurricanes, drought, the destruction of ecosystems and floods that consume large swathes of the eastern seaboard. And she argued that the Congress had already granted the EPA the authority to mitigate "catastrophic harms."
     
    "Whatever else this Court may know about, it does not have a clue about how to address climate change," she wrote, accusing the conservative justices of making themselves the "decision maker on climate policy."
     
    "I cannot think of many things more frightening," Kagan concluded.
     
     

    Republicans welcome the court's reining in of bureaucracy

    Leading conservative politicians immediately welcomed the decision, heralding it as a win for constraining government overreach in Washington by unelected bureaucrats.
     
    "We are pleased this case returned the power to decide one of the major environmental issues of the day to the right place to decide it: the US Congress, comprised of those elected by the people to serve the people," said Patrick Morrisey, the Republican attorney general of West Virginia, a major coal-producing state. 
     
    "This is about maintaining the separation of powers, not climate change," Morrisey said.
     
    The problem, however, with the Supreme Court returning issues to Congress is lawmakers' difficulty in getting anything significant done. The country's polarization and the Senate filibuster rules have made advancing major bills on key issues -- like voting rights and gun regulation -- a challenge in a narrowly divided Senate. The recently passed gun legislation, for example, fell well short of the substantial overhauls many Democrats would have liked to have seen. But they had to pass something that could get 10 GOP votes, even though Democrats nominally have a monopoly on political power in Washington. 
     
    And there is no appetite among Republicans to tackle climate change. The court's right-wing majority is therefore playing an important role in asserting a conservative political agenda to thwart any change a Democratic Congress and President could enact. 
     
    That's hard for foreigners to understand when it comes to an issue as urgent as climate change. But it ensures that any efforts to commit the United States to the global climate fight will inevitably lead to years of political battles in Washington. And it is yet another example of how the country's polarization is threatening its global leadership role."
     
    ~~~~~
     
      ~ More from The Washington Post.
     
     



     
      ~ UPDATE/edit: 07/02:

    Everyone just about is wondering what is next - particularly after Clarence Thomas's remarks last week.



     
     ~ From Bloomberg:
     
     
     
    Have a nice weekend y'all. ...

    .............